Analysis

Why Mercedes and Red Bull’s compression ratio trick is legal

Sarah Mitchell Sarah Mitchell 22 Dec 2025 4 min read
Why Mercedes and Red Bull’s compression ratio trick is legal

Mercedes and Red Bull Powertrains have discovered a technical loophole in the 2026 power unit regulations that could deliver a significant performance advantage. The two manufacturers are reportedly exploiting a gap in the rulebook concerning compression ratios, using materials that expand under heat to increase efficiency when the engine runs. While rival teams and engine suppliers are considering protests to the FIA, the manoeuvre appears entirely within the bounds of the regulations as currently written.

The technical detail behind the power unit innovation

The innovation centres on compression ratio, a fundamental aspect of internal combustion engine performance. Both Mercedes, which supplies power units to Alpine, McLaren and Williams alongside its own team, and Red Bull Powertrains have identified a method to run with an 18:1 compression ratio during operation, despite the 2026 regulations mandating a maximum of 16:1.

The estimated performance gain sits around 15 horsepower, a meaningful advantage in a sport where margins between teams can be measured in tenths of seconds per lap. The key lies in how the regulations define when compliance must be demonstrated.

According to article C5.4.3 of the 2026 technical regulations, no cylinder may exceed a compression ratio of 16:1. Crucially, the regulation specifies that this measurement must be taken at ambient temperature, meaning when the engine is cold and not running. This wording creates the space Mercedes and Red Bull Powertrains have exploited.

How thermal expansion changes compression during operation

The compression ratio calculation divides the total cylinder volume by the clearance volume remaining when the piston reaches top dead centre. Current Formula 1 power units feature six cylinders with a total capacity of 1.6 litres, giving each cylinder a volume of approximately 266.67 cubic millimetres.

The regulations mandate an 80-millimetre bore diameter and a stroke distance of just over 53 millimetres. Under the 16:1 compression ratio requirement measured at ambient temperature, the clearance volume must be 3.537 millimetres.

Mercedes and Red Bull Powertrains have reportedly designed components using materials that expand when heated during engine operation. This thermal expansion reduces the clearance volume by approximately half a millimetre, increasing the effective compression ratio to 18:1 when the power unit runs at operating temperature. Higher compression ratios translate directly into improved thermal efficiency and increased power output.

The approach represents a sophisticated interpretation of the regulations. While the 2025 technical rules stated that compression ratios must not exceed 18:1 without specifying measurement conditions, the 2026 regulations explicitly reference ambient temperature. This specificity has allowed the two manufacturers to argue their designs comply at the mandated measurement point whilst operating differently under racing conditions.

Why protests may struggle to gain traction

Despite reported frustration from rival manufacturers and teams, the technical legality appears solid. The regulations as written only require compliance at ambient temperature, creating an unintended but clear window for this design philosophy.

Until 2025, article 5.4.6 of the technical regulations limited compression ratios to 18:1 without stipulating when measurements should be taken. The addition of “at ambient temperature” in the 2026 rules suggests the FIA intended to clarify measurement procedures rather than restrict operational behaviour, though the wording may not have anticipated this particular interpretation.

Mercedes and Red Bull Powertrains have essentially exploited the difference between static compliance and dynamic operation. The power units meet the letter of the law when measured cold, even if their operational characteristics differ once heated to racing temperatures. Unless the FIA issues a technical directive or rule clarification explicitly closing this interpretation, both manufacturers remain on firm regulatory ground.

The development demonstrates the relentless pursuit of marginal gains that defines modern Formula 1 engineering. Teams and manufacturers continuously probe the boundaries of technical regulations, searching for advantages their competitors have overlooked. This particular innovation required deep understanding of both materials science and regulatory language, combining metallurgical expertise with legal interpretation.

What this means going forward

The compression ratio innovation could significantly influence the competitive order when the new power unit regulations arrive in 2026. If Mercedes and Red Bull Powertrains maintain this advantage throughout development, the four teams using Mercedes engines plus Red Bull Racing could start the season with a meaningful power deficit to their rivals.

Whether the FIA will act remains uncertain. The governing body could issue a technical directive clarifying that compression ratios must remain compliant under all operating conditions, effectively banning the thermal expansion approach. Alternatively, it may allow the interpretation to stand, potentially forcing Ferrari, Honda and any other manufacturers to develop similar solutions or accept a performance disadvantage.

The situation highlights the complexity of modern Formula 1 regulations and the expertise required to exploit every available opportunity. As teams finalise their 2026 power unit designs, this debate over compression ratios may prove decisive in determining which manufacturers lead the next regulatory era.